>Hmm, thanks. >So what you are saying is that we must destroy/recreate the QP as well, >and this implies this must be done at ULP level. Right?
I believe so. >So I guess if CMA rounds the retry count down to the max supported >value, this will be enough for most ULPs, and if not, ULP >can get the etry count, see that it is smaller than what user set, >and destroy/retry. > >Sounds good? I would rather the set failed if the value is too large. We could expose the maximum supported number of retries through a #define in the header file. So, is the proposal to provide a generic set_option call for connection parameters? Is there any other parameter than retries? Does a generic connection timeout value work for TCP as well? - Sean _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
