Sean Hefty wrote: > After thinking about peer to peer more, I think that it could insert the > local QPN after the passive side calls ib_send_cm_rep(), similar to > what's done in the client-server model. If we only want to track local > QPNs for the purposes of handling the COMM_EST event, then tracking on > the passive side is sufficient. If we want to track local QPNs as part > of timewait, then we want tracking on both sides. I went the latter route.
Generally, i guess you need to insert the local QPN into the rb_tree ***before*** sending the REP not after it. Can you state what is the usage being done with the local QPNs in the timeout on REQ flow? Or. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
