On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 11:27 -0700, Greg Lindahl wrote: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 01:03:16PM -0500, Steve Wise wrote: > > > I agree. Plus we already have precedence for rdma_ with the RDMA CMA... > > That's precedence about like "I used the term 'wimps' in a poster > paper once, so now you should allow me to use 'wimps' in my > Astrophysical Journal article." > > True story. Weakly Interacting Massive Particles. Which in turn > spawned MACHOs, MAssive Compact Halo Objects. Fun, but not the way to > do software engineering. > > Hint: did you ever hold a discussion as to whether or not that was the > right transport-neutral name? > > -- greg
You seem to be the only one objecting to rdma_ and/or rdmav_. I've listened to your arguments for why you think rdma is a bad name, and I'm not convinced. This is an interface to RDMA transports... Steve. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
