Quoting r. Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: (SPAM?) Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 0/4] Dispatch communication > related events to the IB CM > > Or Gerlitz wrote: > > I suggest you move forward with committing the patch and once the side > > discussion is done the next step (which i think is NO-OP per the IB > > stack, that is let the ULP handle this) would be implemented. > > I think the open question is whether a call like rdma_establish() needs to be > added to the API. If it is, then I'm not sure that we need to route events > directly to the IB CM. Given the current choices, adding rdma_establish() > may > actually be easier for the ULP than event forwarding, or maybe we just do > both...
I like rdma_establish. Further, adding this will be a very small patch, safe for 2.6.18. -- MST _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
