>Guys, how about we start adding proper library prefixes to names? >IBA really should name things IBA_..., CM should be CM_.. or IB_CM_...
Libibcm uses IB_CM_ in most places. The exception is SIDR, which is IB_SIDR_. IB_SIDR probably should have been IB_CM_SIDR (and is likely just an oversight), but I don't see that IB_SIDR is that bad. >If everyone insists on polluting the IB_ namespace conflicts are unavoidable. I'm not trying to sound harsh here, but the IB CM definitions in ib_types.h seem useless. There's nothing that a user can do with them without an interface to the CM, and I would need to be convinced that there's an application that uses those definitions. - Sean _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
