Quoting r. Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: RE: Conflicting typedefs for "ib_gid_t" > > I agree with your view on iba/ib_types.h > > I'm not sure I understand what you mean in terms of libibumad. He's including > libibmad rather than libibumad. > So I suspect you mean changing this (ib_gid_t) to mad_gid_t ?
Yes, or ib_mad_, or ibmad_. And same for other IB_ and ib_ names there. We really need to do something about names like ib_attr_t. <rant> I also would like the number of typedefs libibmad exposes reduced - its not like you'll be able to convert these structs to anything else transparently without breaking users - anyone sticks their data in there anyway. But this is more a matter of taste. </rant> -- MST _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
