Hi Sean, If we had all the IBTA related defines and structs in a well defined and tracked location there was no reason for OpenSM to have this header. To my best recollection I could not get any agreement to such common IBTA specifications file.
Can I assume you are willing to have such common set of header files??? I would propose having a set of files (one common and one for each class) under include/infiniband/iba > > I like to move away from each library re-defining common IB data types. > Something like ibv_gid should be picked up from libibverbs. > > IMO, the core of the problem is that opensm include files carry too many > legacy typedefs. > > - Sean > > _______________________________________________ > openib-general mailing list > [email protected] > http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > > To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
