Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 12:58, Eitan Zahavi wrote: > >>I did not see this on the reflector. > > > It made it. > > >>We did have some mailer problems. So I am resending to the list >> >>One more thing to add: >>The only other event we considered was PORT_ACTIVE. >>But as it turns out the event is only generated when the port moves into >>ACTIVE state >>which means an SM already handled it... > > > Not sure what you would do with ACTIVE. There are some port selection > rules about port state for umad. I was only saying that although such an event exists we did not know what to do with it. So I agree with you we do not have anything to do with it. > > -- Hal > > >>EZ > >
_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
