I haven't met kernel crashes using rc2. But there always occurred connection refusal when max concurrent connections set above 200. All is right when max concurrent connections is set to below 200. ( If using TCP to take the same test, there is no problem.) (1) This is ApacheBench, Version 2.0.41-dev <$Revision: 1.141 $> apache-2.0 Copyright (c) 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/ Copyright (c) 1998-2002 The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/
Benchmarking www.google.com [through 193.12.10.14:3129] (be patient) Completed 100 requests Completed 200 requests apr_recv: Connection refused (111) Total of 257 requests completed (2) This is ApacheBench, Version 2.0.41-dev <$Revision: 1.141 $> apache-2.0 Copyright (c) 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/ Copyright (c) 1998-2002 The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/ Benchmarking www.google.com [through 193.12.10.14:3129] (be patient) Completed 100 requests Completed 200 requests apr_recv: Connection refused (111) Total of 256 requests completed [EMAIL PROTECTED] squid.test]# zhu --- "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting r. zhu shi song <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > --- "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > Quoting r. zhu shi song > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > (3) one time linux kernel on the client > crashed. I > > > > copy the output from the screen. > > > > Process sdp (pid:4059, threadinfo > 0000010036384000 > > > > task 000001003ea10030) > > > > Call > > > > > > > > Trace:<ffffffffa0205011>{:ib_sdp:sdp_destroy_workto} > > > > <ffffffffa02041ae> {:ib_sdp:sdp_destroy_qp+77} > > > > > > > > > > <ffffffffa02044da>{:ib_sdp:sdp_destruct+279}<ffffffff802a42d2>{sk_free+28} > > > > > > > > > > <ffffffff80146e1e>{worker_thread+419}<ffffffff801333c8>{default_wake_function+0} > > > > > > > > > > <ffffffff801333c8>{default_wake_function+0}<ffffffff8014aabc>{keventd_create_kthread+0} > > > > > > > > > > <ffffffff80146c76>{worker_thread+0}<ffffffff8014aabc>{keventd_create_kthread+0} > > > > > > > > > > <ffffffff8014aa93>{kthread+200}<ffffffff80110e17>{child_rip+8} > > > > > > > > > > <ffffffff8014aabc>{keventd_create_kthread+0}<ffffffff8014a9cb>{kthread+0}<ffffffff80110e0f>{child_rip+0} > > > > Code:8b 40 04 41 39 c6 89 44 24 0c 7d 3b 45 31 > ff > > > 45 > > > > 31 ed 4c 89 > > > > > > > > > > RIP:<ffffffffa0208437>{:ib_sdp:sdp_recv_completion+127}RSP<0000010036385dc8> > > > > CR2:0000000000000004 > > > > <0>kernel panic-not syncing:Oops > > > > > > > > zhu > > > > > > Hmm, the stack dump does not match my sources. > Is > > > this OFED rc1? > > > Could you send me the sdp_main.o and sdp_main.c > > > files from your system please? > > --- > > > Subject: Re: why sdp connections cost so much > memory > > > > please see the attachment. > > zhu > > Ugh, so its crashing inside sdp_bcopy ... > > By the way, could you please re-test with OFED rc2? > We've solved a couple of bugs there ... > > If this still crashes, could you please post the > whole > sdp directory, with .o and .c files? > > Thanks, > > -- > MST > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
