Quoting r. Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mthca: various bug fixes for mthca_query_qp
>
> Michael> The other four bullets make sense however, do they not?
>
> I guess so, although I wonder if anyone will ever care about the
> sq_sig_type() field.
It's not in IB spec query QP, so that might be unlikely.
However, libibverbs seems to be looking at this field:
init_attr->sq_sig_all = resp.sq_sig_all;
so it only seems consistent to fill this in.
What do you think? Maybe its better to remove it from libibverbs?
What about other stuff?
--
MST
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
