James> Given how many levels down this is, I'm going to change my
James> mind. I think the current explicit include is better than
James> what I suggested.Thanks, I agree. No sense introducing such a fragile dependency on an implicit include for such a minimal gain. - R. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
