On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 18:00:23 +0200 Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 01:58:18AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > >... > > Changes since 2.6.18-rc4-mm3: > >... > > +amso1100-build-fix.patch > > > > Fix git-infiniband.patch > >... > > This causes the following compile error on i386: > > <-- snip --> > > ... > CC drivers/infiniband/hw/amso1100/c2.o > /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.18-rc5-mm1/drivers/infiniband/hw/amso1100/c2.c: > In function ‘c2_tx_ring_alloc’: > /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.18-rc5-mm1/drivers/infiniband/hw/amso1100/c2.c:133: > error: implicit declaration of function ‘__raw_writeq’ > make[4]: *** [drivers/infiniband/hw/amso1100/c2.o] Error 1 > That would have been me cheerfully deleting stuff because it didn't build on powerpc. > > There seems to be some confusion regarding whether __raw_writeq() is > considered a platform independent API. > It appears to be undocumented and uncommented hence it's not an API _at all_, is it? What's __raw_writeq() supposed to do, anyway? On alpha it's writeq() without an mb(). On parisc it's writeq() only the data is byte-reversed. On sparc64() it's incomprehensible. On everything else it's writeq(). What a crock. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
