Roland Dreier wrote: > Sean> This patch set appears to be the preferred approach. Any > Sean> objection to committing this? > > It's unfortunate that we have to add a special-case event hook for the > CM, but I guess the iWARP CM changes are so ugly anyway it doesn't > matter much. So I think committing this is OK.
Hi Sean, My thinking is that the thing needs to be committed somewhere or at least please resubmit to the list the version you are intending to merge. We will be able to test it with iser target running on gen2 stack and provide further feedback. I guess testing it can be carried also over SDP under a high rate connection open/close test, or with what ever CM/CMA test does supports reconnecting, the data/before/rtu race happens a lot and the code would be well exercised. You will then be able to push it for 2.6.19 what do you think? Or. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
