On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 12:10, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting r. Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > (which, as I understand it, is really only an issue because opensm can > > > > log so much), > > > > which is what this entire patch series was designed to > > > > address. They are two different problem spaces. > > > > > > So ... wouldn't it be better to address the real issue? > > > As I see it, the problem only appears if you activate opensm in the > > > verbose > > > mode. And the reason to run so for a long time is only if you suspect > > > you'll > > > want to debug something later, without killing opensm. > > > > Those patches are still pending and won't be in OFED 1,1, right ? > > Well, I donnu. If it's assumed reducing log size is important enough > for 1.1, then maybe applying these patches are the way to go?
Right now these also involve an API change and that patch is being reworked (so they couldn't possibly make OFED 1.1 rc4). -- Hal _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
