Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Sean, did we decide what to do for upstream yet? > I would say we need something like the below for 2.6.19 too > (probably just need to update node type check). > And, I like it that this approach leaves all matters of policy > to users (such as whether move QP to RTS after asynchronous event > or after completion event).
I will go with a patch similar to this one. It seems the most flexible. > As a side note, reasons for frequent loss of RTU must be investigated. A lost RTU shouldn't be any more likely than a lost REQ or REP. Is the RTU never showing up? I will look into the ib_cm and see if there's an issue that would cause an RTU not to be retried. - Sean _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
