On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 17:17, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting r. Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > If path MTU selector in path query allows MTU 1K (e.g. "best MTU") > > > and one of the sides is Tavor, select the best MTU that is 1K > > > and not the largest possible. > > > > How would it be identified if the SA supports this ? > > You mean, if SA ignores mtu selector?
No; I meant detect that one end of the PR request is a Tavor. Wasn't that part of it ? If SA doesn't support MTU selector and ignoring MTU selector, it is not compliant and should be fixed. > Then we are not worse off than we were before we set it - we get 2K MTU for > tavor and it works a bit slower. > > > > If path MTU selector requires 2K MTU, return path with 2K MTU. > > > > Also, I'm not sure that this is the required difference in the SA > > requests :-( > > What do you mean? > Its not required, but its legal and it will give us better performance. I mean that there is no requirement on what the IPoIB SA PR request looks like what you are using to differentiate from the PR requests for a connection setup. -- Hal _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
