Hi Shasha, Hal, I'm back online.
Hal Rosenstock wrote: >On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 20:04, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: >[snip...] > > >>>>>To summarize the functionality change: >>>>>1. Added enable_quirks option >>>>>2. If enable_quirks is FALSE do nothing >>>>> >>>>> >>>>I see those quirks are SA specific. Then should this option be called >>>>'enable_sa_quirks' instead? >>>> >>>> >>>Not sure what the right "granularity" is for this. Would all quirks be >>>enabled at once or would this end up being a pick and choose ? >>> >>> >>Of course this matters how we define this (so I was asking). Right now I >>see that this is used for SA. >> >> > >Would there be other SA quirks ? Would there be SM quirks ? >Are they more hardware related and then tavor_quirks would make more >sense ? > > Who knows? >Would all the quirks be enabled together or is it a mix and match ? > > I think that as we currently one only one quirk we can avoid this till later when we will have a few. >It's unclear to me which is the best way to go on these aspects. > >-- Hal > > >_______________________________________________ >openib-general mailing list >openib-general@openib.org >http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > >To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > > _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
