Hi Eitan, On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 11:59, Eitan Zahavi wrote: > Hi Hal
I think this patch is really 5/13 rather than 2/13. > No need for stdio.h but do need stdlib.h ... It appears to be the other way around (stdio.h needed but stdlib.h isn't), right ? > Also map snprintf to _snprintf in windows case > > Thanks > > Eitan > > Signed-off-by: Eitan Zahavi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Index: opensm/osm_subnet.c > =================================================================== > --- opensm/osm_subnet.c (revision 9502) > +++ opensm/osm_subnet.c (working copy) > @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ > > #include <stdlib.h> Should this include of stdlib.h also be removed ? -- Hal > #include <string.h> > +#include <stdio.h> > #include <complib/cl_debug.h> > #include <opensm/osm_subnet.h> > #include <opensm/osm_opensm.h> > @@ -65,7 +66,6 @@ > #include <opensm/osm_node.h> > #include <opensm/osm_multicast.h> > #include <opensm/osm_inform.h> > -#include <stdlib.h> > > /********************************************************************** > **********************************************************************/ > @@ -659,6 +659,9 @@ __osm_subn_opts_unpack_charp( > } > } > > +#ifdef WIN32 > +#define snprintf _snprintf > +#endif > /********************************************************************** > **********************************************************************/ > static void > _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
