Quoting r. Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I think what we should do is follow the IB verbs extensions and expose > multiple CQ event vectors, and let the consumer pick which one to use > when creating a CQ. If IPoIB wants to go round robin itself, that > would be fine. > > This is what I tried to set the userspace API up for. Nothing in > userspace would have to change for this -- the kernel just needs to > add multiple EQ support.
Sounds good. Fancy taking it up now, or should I look into this? -- MST _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
