> Since the ucma will not make it for the 2.6.19 feature merge window, why > not target both the ucma and the cma ud/ud-mulitast support for 2.6.20? > > This way you would be doing one big ABI change and would not carry this > HUGE svn/git diff. > > As I have mentioned in the other thread, once it would make sense from > your schedule to do the patch preparation work, it would be good to push > it into the for-2.6.20 branch of Roland's tree from where it can go to > the -mm tree so people can start testing it. >
This sounds good to me too. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
