Roland Dreier wrote: > Eitan> If the tracking (ref counting) was done at the MAD level - > Eitan> no change to IPoIB would have been required ... > > It doesn't seem very feasible to implement a complete local copy of > the SA (in the kernel no less) so that we can allow unprivileged > processes to send on QP1. > I was not proposing a copy of the SA. I was more suggesting tracking down specific Class/Method/Attribute combinations (with the tracking we already do for TID). So the refcount is just tracking those. I do not see why it is more complicated then the code already in ib_multicast. Just down the stack. > - R. > > _______________________________________________ > openib-general mailing list > [email protected] > http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > > To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general >
_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
