Sean strikes again. That seems perfect.
On 10/13/06 12:29 PM, "Steve Wise" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That seems good. > > > > On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 09:29 -0700, Sean Hefty wrote: >> Tom Tucker wrote: >>> The only "correct" way would be to declare a sockaddr structure * to a >>> struct socket_storage allocated buffer and waste 4 bytes in the rdma_cm_id >>> structure. >>> >>> Anyway, it's buggin' me...Maybe I'm being anal... >>> >>> Thoughts? >> >> We could change the definition to something similar in the kernel: >> >> struct sockaddr src_addr; >> u8 src_pad[sizeof(struct sockaddr_storage) - >> sizeof(struct sockaddr)]; >> >> I'm guessing this sort of change wouldn't require any changes to any of the >> clients. >> >> - Sean >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openib-general mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general >> >> To unsubscribe, please visit >> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general >> > _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
