somenath wrote: > Sean Hefty wrote: > >> Can you confirm that I have your test failure correctly? >> >> pri_path = path 1 >> alt_path = NULL >> works > > > > yes. > >> >> pri_path = path 2 >> alt_path = NULL >> works >> > yes. > >> pri_path = alt_path = path 1 >> works >> > > no, I haven't tested that. I can try that too, if u think that can > provide useful info.. > >> pri_path = alt_path = path 2 >> works > > > > no, not tried that either. > >> >> pri_path = path 1 >> alt_path = path 2 >> fails >> > > yes, that fails to change the QP state to RTR in req_recv_handler().. > (if I don't change the state to RTR, REP sending will be successful) > >> Are the only difference between path 1 and 2 the S/DGIDs and S/DLIDs? >> > that's how its coded, but I haven't verified that in req_recv_handler(). > I will verify that and let you know (by dumping both the paths in > rec_recv_handler()).
for node1: primary_path: dlid=0x1f06 slid=0x1d06 raw=0x0 flow=0x0 hop=0x0 tra=0x0 rev=0x1 numb=0x0 pkey=0xffff sl=0x0 mtus=0x2 mtu=0x4 rate=0x2 plts=0x3 plt=0x2 pref=0x2 alt_path: dlid=0x2006 slid=0x1e06 raw=0x0 flow=0x0 hop=0x0 tra=0x0 rev=0x1 numb=0x0 pkey=0xffff sl=0x0 mtus=0x2 mtu=0x4 rate=0x2 plts=0x3 plt=0x2 pref=0x2 they seem to be same, thanks, som. > thanks, som. > > > > >> - Sean > > > > _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
