I was not on the call last week, but I understand that there was some discussion about exactly this point (ditch SVN and go 100% git): the decision was to stick with SVN for userspace stuff and stick with git for kernel stuff.
However, this is a larger audience than was on the call. Is there a significant movement here from the developers to move to 100% git? (I don't really care) On Oct 17, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: > On 17:04 Tue 17 Oct , Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> Quoting r. Steve Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> At the risk of opening a can of worms, is there any reason we >>> don't move >>> the user stuff into its own git tree? This would get rid of svn >>> altogether... >> >> If we do, that should probably be multiple git trees - verbs, >> management, >> tests are all more or less independent and developed mostly by >> different people. > > Reasonable. And generally this should not be too bad. > > Sasha > > _______________________________________________ > openib-general mailing list > [email protected] > http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > > To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/ > openib-general -- Jeff Squyres Server Virtualization Business Unit Cisco Systems _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
