Quoting r. Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: convention for git directories on the new git OFA server > > > 1. Development trees: each one will place the development tree under > > his/her home: > > ~<username>/scm/topic.git (e.g. ~mst/scm/sdp.git) > > 2. Stable/release trees: these trees will be located under /pub: > > /pub/scm/<name>.git (e.g. /pub/scm/ofed-1.1.git) > > 3. All trees (development and stable) should be exposed via git web > > interface. > > > > I think this methodology is similar to the way git trees are > > handled in Linux, and its also a simple convention that will make > > it easy to understand the type of each tree > > If you mean the way git trees are handled on kernel.org, that's not > true. There is only one class of git tree -- kernel.org happens to > use /pub/scm but ~/scm/ is perfectly fine.
Yes, but: Linus's tree is under git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git E.g. stable tree is under git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.18.y.gi So I do see the analogy: development trees are under developer's name, stable trees are under stable/version. No? -- MST _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
