On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 15:08:30 -0800 "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote: > > > so... Is this: > > > > htirq-refactor-so-we-only-have-one-function-that-writes-to-the-chip.patch > > htirq-allow-buggy-drivers-of-buggy-hardware-to-write-the-registers.patch > > You should drop the above patch from Eric... > > > htirq-allow-buggy-drivers-of-buggy-hardware-to-write-the-registers-update.patch > > ...in favour of this one, which is my rework of Eric's patch. > > > ib-ipath-program-intconfig-register-using-new-ht-irq-hook.patch If you look, you'll see that the htirq-allow-buggy-drivers-of-buggy-hardware-to-write-the-registers-update.patch which I merged is the diff between Eric's patch and yours (ie: the diff which you should have sent ;)) > > considered 2.6.19 material? > > Yes, please. I might be able to simplify the ib-ipath patch (by a > matter of a few lines), but it works fine as it stands. > ho hum, OK. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
