> Quoting Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: 2.6.20: outstanding patches and issues > > fix_query_qp_in_reset.patch > > will merge > > ib_verbs_h_missing_kref.patch > > does this actually fix any compilation problems? if not I think it's > better for 2.6.21.
2.6.21 then. > mthca_0_fmr_page_fix.patch > > already merged in my tree pending a pull, right? Yes. > Patch 5 of 5 is at v3, hope it's all good now. > > you only listed 4... > > mthca_1_merge_mr_fmr_on_64bit.patch > mthca_2_fast_registration.patch > mthca_3_alloc_consistent.patch > mthca_4_dma_align_reserved_mtts.patch Because I counted mthca_0_fmr_page_fix.patch > still need review but I don't think they're appropriate for 2.6.20 > given how much they change some pretty key memory registration stuff. Hmph. I was afraid you'd say this. The only reason I'm surprised is that these do fix FMR on non-cache-coherent architectures - it's a bug fix, not just a feature searies. And you did say (patches 1-2 are what was posted then): http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.openib/34184/match=patchv2+mthca+speed+memory+registration+filling+mtts+directly "I think this still can go into 2.6.20 after -rc1 if we can get this fixed up." -- MST _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
