On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 21:37, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: > On 13:43 Mon 20 Nov , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 20:53, Ira Weiny wrote: > > > Our sysadmins have been rotating OpenSM's osm.log file and then restarting > > > OpenSM. As this is a less than optimal solution if you have jobs running > > > on > > > the system, I wrote this patch (against OFED 1.1) which adds a handler for > > > SIGUSR1 that reopens OpenSM's log file without a restart. > > > > This is a good idea to incorporate into OpenSM. > > > > Any objections if this is bundled with SIGHUP handling rather than > > SIGUSR1 which is not backward compatible as Sasha indicated ? > > Actually looking more at this I noticed that SIGUSR* signals are not > used anymore with linuxthread couple of years (since kernel 2.1.xx, > where RT signals support was introduced).
Yes, that's what I saw too. > So I think it is not real > issue today - some #ifdef should be sufficient. > > I reviewed and tested the original patch (it is appliable very well) and > have some fixes/improvements. Two incremental patches are followng. Thanks! -- Hal > Sasha _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
