Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>>+enum {
>>+ IB_SA_SM_TRAP_GID_IN_SERVICE = 64,
>>+ IB_SA_SM_TRAP_GID_OUT_OF_SERVICE = 65,
>>+ IB_SA_SM_TRAP_CREATE_MC_GROUP = 66,
>>+ IB_SA_SM_TRAP_DELETE_MC_GROUP = 67,
>>+ IB_SA_SM_TRAP_PORT_CHANGE_STATE = 128,
>>+ IB_SA_SM_TRAP_LINK_INTEGRITY = 129,
>>+ IB_SA_SM_TRAP_EXCESSIVE_BUFFER_OVERRUN = 130,
>>+ IB_SA_SM_TRAP_FLOW_CONTROL_UPDATE_EXPIRED = 131,
>
>
> Why not 144 and 145 too ?
I was just trying to setup the framework first. Adding new traps isn't overly
difficult, but I would need to define appropriate data details as well.
>
>>+ IB_SA_SM_TRAP_BAD_M_KEY = 256,
>>+ IB_SA_SM_TRAP_BAD_P_KEY = 257,
>>+ IB_SA_SM_TRAP_BAD_Q_KEY = 258,
>
>
> What about 259 ?
Same as above.
> Component mask is meaningless for InformInfo so these shouldn't be
> needed.
That's a good point. These should be removed. (I had defined them before I
realized component mask was ignored for InformInfo.)
- Sean
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
