Hi,
>> shouldn't there be a call like unlocked_ioctl or compat_ioctl like
>> defined in this module?
>
> In user_mad.c, both unlocked/compat_ioctl are defined:
>
> static struct file_operations umad_fops = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .read = ib_umad_read,
> .write = ib_umad_write,
> .poll = ib_umad_poll,
> .unlocked_ioctl = ib_umad_ioctl,
> .compat_ioctl = ib_umad_ioctl,
> .open = ib_umad_open,
> .release = ib_umad_close
> };
Thanks for the help. I have overlooked a patch where unlocked_ioctl and
compat_ioctl is replaced by ioctl in the struct above.
Thanks Michael
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
