On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 12:31, Or Gerlitz wrote: > Eitan Zahavi wrote: > > Or Gerlitz wrote: > >> Eitan Zahavi wrote: > > >> So you are saying that the GW **has** to listen on IGMP at the Eth > >> side and **has** to do IB SA join in the only way that forces the SA > >> to create the group --> FullMember ? > > > Yes > > >> If indeed, this is kind of bad, > > > I find it very reasonable > > OK, going fwd with this approach, the GW got IGMP --> so it did FULL > MEMBER join and the group is created, what is going on when the Eth > multicast node stopped doing RX is there a "leave" IGMP which the GW can > trap and act?
Leave is supported in IGMPv2 and v3. v1 only had reports so the host(s) would need to be polled in that case. -- Hal > Or. > > > _______________________________________________ > openib-general mailing list > [email protected] > http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > > To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
