Jeff Squyres wrote: > FWIW, having git's for the MPI implementations was asked for on the > call yesterday (by Tziporet, IIRC?). The rationale, as I understood > it, was threefold: > > 1. Putting the MPI release in git provides a level of OFED-specific > history and version control. This was explicitly stated on the call > yesterday. > > 2. MPI's have concrete "releases" to OFED just like all other ULP's, > especially if there is any OFED-specific packaging involved in the > MPI's release. This was not stated on the call, but it makes sense > to me. > > 3. Putting everything in git makes it nicely uniform for OFED to be > assembled. This was not stated on the call, and I'm sure it's not a > requirement, but it is a little nice to be uniform when assembling > OFED (my $0.02). > > 4. We used to put the MPI releases in SVN (tarball or SRPM) for prior > OFED release processes, so putting them in a git seems to parallel > that procedure. > > I don't really care one way or another; this was just my > understanding of why it was requested. > > > Hi, Jeff is correct - I requested this from the reasons above.
Tziporet _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
