[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 18.01.2007 16:26:58: > > qpnum is actually only required from poll cq if srq is supported. > > so ehca can just fill in NULL. > actually the IB spec requires QPN in the work completion if either SRQ > or base queue management extensions are supported. I'm not sure why > though. It seems at least for current code it is fine for ehca to > report wc->qp as NULL. > I've update the patch in my for-2.6.21 branch to do that, and pushed > it out. Just want to make sure I understand this properly: One day, if eHCA supports srq, will I have to set qp pointer with a valid address or can I still leave it to NULL? Roland, you are talking about QPN. By that you mean also qp pointer? Regards Nam
_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
