Bill,
I for one would like the OFA components clearly distinguished from
things like the (non-OFA) MPI implementations which are distributed with
OFED on a "grace-and-favor" basis as a convenience to users. It is my
view (which may or may not be shared by others) that they are not
integral parts of OFED itself.
Steve
Woodruff, Robert J wrote:
Bill Magro wrote,
Does is make sense to break out the components that aren't part of OFA,
but are OFA consumers,
into a separate consumers section? Examples would be the various MPI
implementations.
--Bill
Probably does, but don't think that it is really needed for this
go round as the important information is to get the list of maintainers
published so that people know who to go to.
One could also argue that since OpenMPI and MVAPICH are not really
developed within OFA, just shipped by OFED, they should not even
be in the list, however, I suppose it does not hurt, so I am inclined
to leave them in.
woody
_______________________________________________
openib-promoters mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-promoters
begin:vcard
fn:Stephen Langdon
n:Langdon;Stephen
org:Hewlett-Packard, HPC Division;Consulting & Architecture Group
adr:MRO1-3/J14;;200 Forest Street;Marlborough;MA;01451;USA
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:HP Fellow
tel;work:+1 508-467-3774
tel;fax:+1 978 742 1141
tel;home:+1 978-456-8177
tel;cell:+1 978-618-8599
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
