It could be a subcommittee or its own committee, I don't feel strongly either way, but would suggest that a number of folks who will be on the technical committee will also be on an interop committee, so that group is probably in the best position to recommend how to organize themselves to achieve their collective goals. From personal experience, trying to get/keep committees active and productive is harder than we'd like, so limiting the fragmentation of groups when possible is advantageous since there is overhead associated with managing groups. But if there is a passionate and focused group that wants to work explicitly and exclusively on interop, we should take advantage of that desire and create the right organizational capability for them to make those contributions.
Cheers, Brian ___________ Brian Kissel CEO - JanRain, Inc. [email protected] Mobile: 503.342.2668 | Fax: 503.296.5502 519 SW 3rd Ave. Suite 600 Portland, OR 97204 Increase registrations, engage users, and grow your brand with RPX. Learn more at www.rpxnow.com -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Bradley Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:45 AM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [OpenID board] Commitees It was Pam's idea:) So you think it should be a subcommittee of the Technical committee? John B. On 2010-01-20, at 3:39 PM, Brian Kissel wrote: > Good suggestion John. I'd suggest that once the Technical Committee is > officially organized for 2010 (members and chair(s)), that group should make > a recommendation on whether to also create an Interop committee. I'd also > advocate that the Adoption Committee decide if they feel we should also have > a "Marketing" committee. > > Cheers, > > Brian > ___________ > > Brian Kissel > CEO - JanRain, Inc. > [email protected] > Mobile: 503.342.2668 | Fax: 503.296.5502 > 519 SW 3rd Ave. Suite 600 Portland, OR 97204 > > Increase registrations, engage users, and grow your brand with RPX. Learn > more at www.rpxnow.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Bradley > Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 9:40 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: [OpenID board] Commitees > > I was talking to Pam about the committee structure. > > Should we have a committee on interoperability and testing separate from the > Technical committee? > > In the past we have mostly relied on OSIS organizing events, and scenarios. > As one of the OSIS co-chairs I am not suggesting we stop participating in > joint events, however it may be time to start organizing some of that work > as part of the OIDF. > > John Bradley > > > > _______________________________________________ > board mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-board > _______________________________________________ > board mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-board _______________________________________________ board mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-board _______________________________________________ board mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-board
