Nat, I think camps may be a bit strong.
Unless some people are only willing to accept exactly the "openID connect" proposal. We will have a WG shortly to work on the next version of the core protocol. Some of what we have done for AB may or may not get reused as part of that. I am willing to follow the process, that is part of what one agrees to in joining a democratic standards organization. If there are people with other agendas they will have to make there own decisions. John B. On 2010-05-20, at 12:08 AM, Nat Sakimura wrote: > I have a little concern here. It might be a healthy thing to have > discussions, but in the end, I really want v.Next and Connect camp to > unite. In that respect, both chair and co-chair coming from Connect > camp bothers me. > > You say that Joseph was close to be a co-chair, but the situation > surrounding it has changed since then. At the time, there was only > v.Next. Now, it looks like there are v.Next and Connect camp. > > Do not you think it is better to first ask v.Next camp people to step up? > > Would not somebody form v.Next camp step up? > > =nat > > > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:23 PM, David Recordon <[email protected]> wrote: >> The committee elects its own chairs. A few months ago we elected Dick as >> chair and me as co-chair. Joseph was really close to being co-chair. >> >> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Nat Sakimura <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> So, what is the process that chooses committee chairs? >>> >>> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:01 PM, David Recordon <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Today the Board passed a resolution directing the Executive Director, >>>> Chair, >>>> Technical Committee, and outside council to explore a contracting >>>> relationship with Dick Hardt to move the v.Next work forward. Dick >>>> brought >>>> up how there could be a conflict during this process given that he is >>>> the >>>> chair of the Technical Committee. So for the time being I'll take on the >>>> chair role with Joseph Smarr (who wasn't at the meeting but I spoke to a >>>> few >>>> hours ago) taking on the co-chair role. >>>> Technical Committee, expect a followup email around starting to pull >>>> together a set of deliverables and timeline over the next week. The >>>> goal, as >>>> I understand it, is to either have a contract in place or a >>>> determination >>>> that it is unfeasible by the end of the this month. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> --David >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> board mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-board >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Nat Sakimura (=nat) >>> http://www.sakimura.org/en/ >>> http://twitter.com/_nat_en >>> _______________________________________________ >>> board mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-board >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> board mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-board >> >> > > > > -- > Nat Sakimura (=nat) > http://www.sakimura.org/en/ > http://twitter.com/_nat_en > _______________________________________________ > board mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-board
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ board mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-board
