On 2010-05-31, at 7:05 PM, John Bradley wrote: > Dick, > > You know that XRI is used by multiple OP. It is not something a RP site > demands. > > In discovery going forward we need to look at how and if XRI identifiers are > supported. > > Because LRDD and XRI are so close you can normalize a XRI by adding @xri.net > to the end and doing webfinger/LRDD resolution to get a XRD. > > People may be opposed to XRI on philosophical grounds, and want it removed. > > Breaking peoples openID without a good reason should be avoided. > > I prefer to look at it as coming up with a suitable discovery flow and then > determining what identifier formats are appropriate. > > If at the end of the day XRI can't be supported we will discover that. I > would prefer not to make that a precondition.
I'd like to hear from people that have implemented XRI to say they really need it. > > There are a number of equally under-utilized features of AX we could look at:) Agreed. AX was not well utilized. The community had enough issues trying to move an identifier. :) _______________________________________________ board mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-board
