FYI. Thanks Mike for pulling together the call and summarizing!
--
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Mike Jones <[email protected]>
Date: June 4, 2010 5:33:27 PM PDT
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]
>
Cc: Anthony Nadalin <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Specs council status and work - POSSIBLE CALL
TODAY
David Recordon, Allen Tom, and I just got off the specs council call
that we had. While our call didn't represent a quorum of the specs
council, we agreed upon these points:
All the proposed working groups should proceed to be formed.
We encourage all the working groups to work together towards as a
seamless a whole as possible.
There's a growing recognition that there’s substantial commonality i
n the mechanisms behind the artifact binding, the connect proposal,
and the possible evolution of the hybrid specification.
We encourage people to join the working groups and do the actual
work, including implementations.
-- Mike
From: Chris Messina [[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 4:11 PM
To: David Recordon
Cc: Allen Tom; Anthony Nadalin; Mike Jones; [email protected]
; Dick Hardt
Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Specs council status and work - POSSIBLE CALL
TODAY
FWIW, +1.
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:08 PM, David Recordon <[email protected]>
wrote:
Agreed with Allen.
--David
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Allen Tom <[email protected]> wrote:
I think we’ve had enough time to consider the new proposals, and tha
t all the proposed WGs should be formed.
Allen
On 6/4/10 11:52 AM, "Dick Hardt" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2010-06-04, at 10:01 AM, Mike Jones wrote:
First, unless anyone voices an objection to Breno filling the
remaining slot, the specs council now consists of:
Johnny Bufu
Dick Hardt
Mike Jones
Breno de Medeiros
David Recordon
Nat Sakimura
Allen Tom
+1
Second, I believe that this is the status of existing specification
proposals:
Connect: Proposed Fri, May 21. Will be
automatically approved on Sat, Jun 5.
I asked a number of questions about Connect that I have not yet seen
responses to. I think the issues need to be addressed or the
proposal withdrawn.
Discovery: Proposed Fri, May 21. Will be
automatically approved on Sat, Jun 5.
Core: Proposed Mon, May 24. Will be automatically
approved on Tue, Jun 8.
Attributes: Proposed Tue, May 25. Will be
automatically approved on Wed, Jun 9.
Therefore, if we’re going to provide any input to the Connect and Di
scovery working groups before they’re automatically approved after 1
5 days of inaction on our part, we need to do it today.
We can also do it over email!
Does anyone have concerns with Discovery, Core and Attributes? David
had mentioned that some used the OpenID term and some did not have
enough proposers. I think all those issues have now been addressed.
--
Chris Messina
Open Web Advocate, Google
Personal: http://factoryjoe.com
Follow me on Buzz: http://buzz.google.com/chrismessina
...or Twitter: http://twitter.com/chrismessina
This email is: [ ] shareable [X] ask first [ ] private
_______________________________________________
board mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-board
