+1 as long as we are clear Connect is just merging with AB, and the final name 
or version is TBA.

John B.
On 2011-02-21, at 6:57 PM, Breno de Medeiros wrote:

> + 1 for the closing of this groups
> 
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 13:53, Mike Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
> At the latest OpenID board meeting, I took the action item to have the 
> specifications close down inactive working groups.  This is to help eliminate 
> confusion among the members about where work is occurring and focus people’s 
> efforts on the active working groups.
> 
>  
> Per section 4.4 of the OpenID process document, “The Specifications Council 
> may recommend closure of a WG at any time that the WG has not had Minimum 
> Membership for six consecutive months at the time of closure, and such 
> recommendation will promptly be submitted to a vote of the OIDF membership, 
> in accordance with the voting procedures in §3.”  “Minimum Membership” is 
> defined in section 1.6 as “five contributors”.
> 
>  
> It’s clear that all of these working groups meet this criteria in terms of 
> lack of participation by 5 members within the last 6 months:
> 
> ·         v.Next Core
> 
> ·         v.Next Discovery
> 
> ·         v.Next Attributes
> 
> ·         v.Next Certification
> 
> ·         v.Next User Experience
> 
>  
> Also, given the consensus to merge the Connect work into the Artifact Binding 
> work, I would argue that we should close the Connect working group at the 
> same time, so that it’s clear that people wanting to contribute to it should 
> join the Artifact Binding working group, where the work is actually 
> proceeding.  Formally, there have been 7 contributors on the Connect working 
> group list in the last 6 months:  Breno de Medeiros, Chris Messina, Chuck 
> Mortimore, David Recordon, John Bradley, Joseph Smarr, and Nat Sakimura.  The 
> most recent contribution was 11/3/10.  So we could either wait a few months 
> to close it, or if three of the above contributors agree that it should be 
> closed, I believe we could proceed with the membership vote to close the 
> working group at the same time.  (I’d rather not have two membership votes 
> closing working groups.)
> 
>  
> So after a discussion period, unless people form consensus around a different 
> course of action, I’m going to propose a specs council vote that we close all 
> 6 of these working groups.
> 
>  
>                                                                 Thanks all,
> 
>                                                                 -- Mike
> 
>  
> P.S.  The present membership of the specifications council is:
> 
> ·         Johnny Bufu
> 
> ·         Breno de Medeiros
> 
> ·         Dick Hardt
> 
> ·         Mike Jones
> 
> ·         David Recordon
> 
> ·         Nat Sakimura
> 
> ·         Allen Tom
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> --Breno

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
board mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-board

Reply via email to