November 14, 2022 OpenID Board Meeting Notes

Present in Person:
Mike Jones
Marie Jordan
Nat Sakimura
Don Thibeau
Mike Leszcz
Gail Hodges
John Bradley
George Fletcher
Vittorio Bertocci
Bjorn Hjelm
Dirk Balfanz

Present Online:
Elcio Calefi
Wes Dunnington
Asish Jain
Naveen CM
Takehisa Shibata
Kosuke Koiwai
Nancy Cam-Winget

Absent:
Luis Da Silva
Filip Verley (who had problems joining the Teams meeting)

Guests
Mike Leszcz
Tom Smedinghoff
Debbie Bucci
Dima Postnikov
Andre Priebe


1.       New Board Representatives
Elcio Calefi joined the board representing Open Finance Brazil.  Dirk Balfanz 
is representing Google.


2.       Healthcare Whitepaper Update
Debbie Bucci told us about interest in the Healthcare whitepaper.  Don 
suggested that a next step might be a liaison agreement with the CAIRN Alliance.


3.       Open Banking, Open Data Crossing Borders Whitepaper Update
Dima Postnikov believes that the next generation of Open Banking APIs will 
enable global interoperability.  Dima is asking for feedback from the board and 
others.  The goal is to publish before the holidays.


4.       IoT Whitepaper Update
Andre Priebe updated us on the IoT whitepaper effort.  Vittorio asked what the 
change in the world is that we'd like to see as a result of this whitepaper.  
Vittorio observed problems with scoping because the space is vast.  Without 
specific focus, we won't have much chance of succeeding.  Andre said that he's 
collecting use cases.

Bjorn observed that the decision to look at IoT had to have started somewhere 
but it's not clear to him what that somewhere is.  He said that there's a lot 
of standards in this space.

Mike Jones asked what expertise the OpenID Foundation has that's causing us to 
look at the IoT space.  He also said that he has similar questions about the 
healthcare space, where we have failed before.

John talked about having a management fabric for IoT devices.  He said that 
that might use OpenID Connect.  He said that you need strong identity proofing 
to get into the management framework.

Nancy said that IoT is a very board term.  There are manned and unmanned 
devices.  There are consumer devices.  There are devices that go into critical 
infrastructure.  She agrees with a lot of the comments that have been made.  It 
depends upon the categorization and the scope of the devices that we're looking 
into.

Gail said that the board agreed about a year ago that the intersection with IoT 
was an area we should investigate.

Bjorn thought that we should continue this conversation at IIW.  Bjorn said 
that in his experience with automotive systems, they're not about identity - 
they're about functionality.

Vittorio thought that the outcome should be a research report to the board - 
not a whitepaper.  Mike Jones agreed.  Marie asked if we create study groups.  
Mike Jones said that we do.  Vittorio said that whitepapers should meet a 
minimum bar if we are going to be giving people advice.

Wes doesn't think we should publish anything until it's clear that we have 
something to say.

Nat concluded that we should talk to external experts and produce an internal 
study as the first step.


5.       Tipping Points
We talked about what aspects of our work are at tipping points.  Gail asked if 
we want to be more involved in multi-lateral federations.

Nat said that multi-lateral organizations' recommendations often become legal 
instruments in participating companies.  Nat said that, as a standards 
organization, we may want to be advising them so that their recommendations 
make sense.

Tom said that a UN Commission just finalized its model law on identity 
management.

Gail said that last year, the board suggested that we monitor developments in 
the blockchain and cryptocurrency spaces.  FinCEN is monitoring these 
activities.

Bjorn said that the turmoil in that space has to do with disclosure.  He thinks 
the space is immature.  He's willing to have us monitor it but it's premature 
for us to do anything.  He thinks the SIOP work is a good contribution of ours 
to the space and potentially relevant.

Vittorio agreed with Bjorn's points.  He thinks that central bank 
cryptocurrencies might be the place where we could contribute.  He said that 
what's happening now isn't the result of a lack of standards; it's a result of 
willful attempts to avoid regulations.

Nat is involved in a group trying to determine how to regulate cryptocurrencies.

Mike Jones said that the cryptocurrency space has a very bad reputation for 
good reasons.  He's very reluctant to intermix the OpenID Foundation's good 
reputation with theirs.

At a meta point, Mike Jones said that he personally tries to find areas of work 
where he has unique leverage to add value.  He thinks that the OpenID 
Foundation should be doing the same.  We should choose projects where we can 
move the needle and produce contributions that matter.

Ashish talked about other potential areas of low-hanging fruit.

Marie said that Stanford is working with the Digital Currency Global 
Initiative.  We might want to investigate that.


6.       Budget Update
Our cash balance is $1.3M.  We're getting over 98% renewals of corporate 
members and project to retain all sustaining members.  Certification revenue is 
at 137% of projections.

Preliminary 2023 budget estimates were presented.  We projected revenue 
conservatively.


7.       Possible Staff Enhancements
One possibility is adding a part-time technical lead.  This person could 
contribute to liaison work.  Another possibility is a marketing lead.  They 
could do outreach to key prospects.  They could do newsletters.  There could be 
a social media presence.  We could use additional administrative support.  
Meeting scheduling with strategic partners is one possible task.  We could also 
add interns.

Vittorio supports not just having a skin-and-bones organization.  He asked if 
we have someone in mind for the technical lead.  He said that unless the person 
is strong, having them could actually do more damage than good.

George noted that we have reserves to cover this for a year.  He asked what we 
would do in a following year if the budget stays the same.  George wants our 
decisions to be sustainable, particularly given the potential recessionary 
environment that we're entering.

Bjorn agreed that we want to make sustainable decisions.  He remembers not long 
ago when we were trying to preserve the certification program when it was 
bleeding money.

George asked about the structure of the contracts.  Gail responded that all 
would be part-time.

Mike Jones proposed an amendment to the resolution to change it from the ED 
proceeding with hiring to the ED locating potential candidates for the board to 
hire.

John made the motion as amended and Mike seconded.  The resolution passed 
unanimously.


8.       Officer Positions
We asked people to consider running for officer roles.  John would like to 
train a new treasurer.  Koske asked for a description of the treasurer role.  
Mike L. agreed to provide it.

The board was asked if anyone else would like to join the strategic task force.

Attachment: November 14, 2022 OpenID Board Meeting Notes.docx
Description: November 14, 2022 OpenID Board Meeting Notes.docx

_______________________________________________
board mailing list
bo...@lists.openid.net
https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-board

Reply via email to