LoA 2 also involves identity proofing and many OPs does not satisfy it, even if it can satisfy the technical portion. Banks etc. on the other hand, will be able to satisfy it, and in my experience, they are looking at it as an opportunity, at least in Japan.
So, it can be regarded as a new market opener than evolution of the current OPs. =nat On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Brian Kissel <bkis...@janrain.com> wrote: > John, that’s a very good question. > > > > For the OPs on the list, how many of you envision evolving your services to > LoA 2 if a clear path could be developed and agreed to? > > > > We should certainly not constrain ourselves to what current OPs intend to > support, but we should also be pragmatic about the rate at which we evolve > the technology cognizant of whether and when any OPs would commit to making > the necessary changes to support the upgrade. > > > > Looking forward to feedback from others. > > > Brian > > *___________* > > * * > > *Brian Kissel <http://www.linkedin.com/pub/0/10/254>* > > *CEO, JanRain - **OpenID-enable your websites, customers, partners, and > employees* > > 5331 SW Macadam Ave., Suite 375, Portland, OR 97239 > > *Email*: bkis...@janrain.com *Cell*: 503.866.4424 *Fax*: > 503.296.5502 > > > > *From:* openid-specs-boun...@lists.openid.net [mailto: > openid-specs-boun...@lists.openid.net] *On Behalf Of *John Bradley > *Sent:* Thursday, August 13, 2009 10:00 AM > *To:* Chris Messina > *Cc:* openid-specs@lists.openid.net > *Subject:* Re: specs Digest, Vol 36, Issue 1 > > > > Chris > > > > I think we are agreeing. OpenID needs to play to it's strengths. Chasing > shiny things is tempting. > > > > We need to carefully consider the impact of changes. > > > > That is not to say that openID shouldn't evolve. > > > > There are always tradeoffs. > > > > Remember that a GSA LoA 2 or 3 profile is focused on the Gov accepting the > assertions for specific uses. > > > > Other people are free to make there own determinations for other use cases. > > > > I am interested in finding out if IdP really want to be certified at LoA 2 > with all of the extra identity > proofing, liability and other things that go with that. > > > > A LoA 2 certification for a IdP involves a lot more than just tweaking some > protocol peaces. > > > > Are there OPs that want that? > > > > John B. > > On 13-Aug-09, at 9:11 AM, Chris Messina wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:34 AM, John Bradley <jbrad...@mac.com> wrote: > > Some may ask if we add artifact binding, signatures and encryption are we > not reinventing SAML Web SSO, or something of equal complexity? > > > I would like to know more about this, but my instinct is always to say "NO" > for as long as possible when any new feature will a) introduce complexity > and b) stifle or impair potential adoption. > > > > That we've come as far as we have is a feat; maintaining that momentum is > critical — and that means making good on the promise of what OpenID offers > *today* — and only extending it with real world examples where people are > implementing kludges (en masse) to serve a common need. > > Chris > > > -- > Chris Messina > Open Web Advocate > > Personal: http://factoryjoe.com > Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/chrismessina > > Citizen Agency: http://citizenagency.com > Diso Project: http://diso-project.org > OpenID Foundation: http://openid.net > > This email is: [ ] bloggable [X] ask first [ ] private > > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 4330 (20090812) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 4332 (20090813) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > _______________________________________________ > specs mailing list > sp...@lists.openid.net > http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs > > -- Nat Sakimura (=nat) http://www.sakimura.org/en/
_______________________________________________ specs mailing list sp...@lists.openid.net http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
