Allen,
In XRD 1.0 we are moving to a link based model.
So a users XRD rather than having to specify the openID providers
service can point to an openID provider.
The URIs that we currently use describe the service not the provider.
I think Nat is looking for a link relationship that describes a user
pointing to a service providers XRD rather than to the service itself.
There will be a bunch of new link types required for various protocols.
John B.
On 2009-09-02, at 5:27 PM, Allen Tom wrote:
Hi Nat,
Can you explain the problem in a bit more detail? Can you give an
example use case?
Thanks
Allen
Nat Sakimura wrote:
The second topic for OpenID 2.1
Maybe, it should be separated to the Discovery but...
In XRD 1.0, we need to define <Rel> type url for the user=OP
relationship.
What shall we use?
Something like:
http://specs.openid.net/rel/openid_provider#
=nat
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
