Any preference for a namespace? We could reuse the openid one that we have for openID 1.1 delegate.
xmlns:openid="http://openid.net/xmlns/1.0"; <Service> <Type>http://specs.openid.net/auth/2.0/return_to</Type> <URI>http://consumer.example.com/return</URI><openid:Policy_url>http://example.com/privacy-policy.html</ openid:Policy_url>
<openid:TOS>http://example.com/terms-of-service.html</openid:TOS> </Service>I should note that this wont work for RP's behind a firewall being accessed from a LAN or VPN.
I am going to observe that if you are all ready on the LAN the privacy policy can be dealt with out of band if necessary.
I am not emotionally attached to the namespace or element names if someone has something else they like.
John B. On 2009-11-13, at 9:51 PM, Breno de Medeiros wrote:
While we are at it do we want to also publish a TOS URI?Don't see why not. -- --Breno +1 (650) 214-1007 desk +1 (408) 212-0135 (Grand Central) MTV-41-3 : 383-A PST (GMT-8) / PDT(GMT-7)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ specs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
