On Nov 16, 2009, at 11:07 AM, John Bradley wrote: > Yes we should have a look at RP Libs. > > So AX currently uses: > openid.ax.type.fname=http://example.com/schema/fullname > > We could allow: > openid.ax.type.fname=fullname > > Though that may break some string handling. > > We could still use a URI safe string like: > openid.ax.type.fname=ax:fullname > > This would NOT be a URI but would be less likely to break existing parsers > and string handling. > > Any ideas other than a code review?
-1 to plain strings. I'm not crazy about the idea of including the nine sreg attributes in the core AX spec, but we've clearly seen that a separate registry doesn't work too well. If they are included in the core spec, I'd much prefer something along the lines of: "To promote interoperability, it is RECOMMENDED that deployers use the following attribute names when appropriate". Does rfc 2119 allow for a STRONGLY RECOMMENDED ? :) -will _______________________________________________ specs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
