On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Santosh Rajan <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1, Nat, Another shameless bump from me, of this post, for the voting. > > I don't agree with the /XRDS/xrd/Service/Type, but we will leave that for > later. > Yes, I am just throwing in the stuff for discussion in the forthcoming WG. > > > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Nat Sakimura <[email protected]> wrote: > >> While we are waiting for the IPR process change (if you have not voted, >> please vote NOW! [1]) >> I took a liberty of making a github repository for the time being. >> >> http://github.com/sakimura/attribute_exchange_1.1 >> >> I have commited draft 02 there. >> >> Only one change apart from bumping up the revision: >> >> - Added a paragraph in discovery section to state that the provider >> should >> advertise the attribute url they supports in /XRDS/xrd/Service/Type. >> >> -- >> Nat Sakimura (=nat) >> http://www.sakimura.org/en/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> specs mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs >> >> > > > -- > http://hi.im/santosh > > > -- Nat Sakimura (=nat) http://www.sakimura.org/en/
_______________________________________________ specs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
