> I don't want this thread to be taken off course, but for the RP to specify > which OPs it supports greatly diminishes the user-centric element of OpenID. > The point of OpenID is that I, as a user, can decide who I trust to store my > data and provide my identity — rather than having to choose from a specific > subset of providers that the RP decides on. In that list you can always choose for: "Use another OP". Isn't this the same as the nascar principle at the moment?
> > . . . > > To your question about how this can be done — and "getting the Facebook folks > involved" — you should read Luke Shepard's post on how Facebook's > accomplishes sign-on with Facebook Connect: > > http://www.sociallipstick.com/?p=86 > http://www.sociallipstick.com/?p=167 > http://www.sociallipstick.com/?p=189 > > Chris > > -- > Chris Messina > Open Web Advocate > > Personal: http://factoryjoe.com > Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/chrismessina > > Citizen Agency: http://citizenagency.com > Diso Project: http://diso-project.org > OpenID Foundation: http://openid.net > > This email is: [ ] shareable [X] ask first [ ] private
_______________________________________________ specs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
