> You don't happen to have a way to shove structured data into AX 1.0 style > types, do you? Sorry, I don't.. But JSON or an XML variant should fit fine?
> > On Dec 15, 2009, at 1:40 AM, Chris Obdam wrote: > >> Discussions is still going on on the mailinglist, or somewhere else too? >> >> Op 14 dec 2009, om 22:12 heeft Joseph Anthony Pasquale Holsten het volgende >> geschreven: >> >>> On Dec 14, 2009, at 2:27 AM, Chris Obdam wrote: >>>> The AX 2.0 workgroup scope says : >>>>> Introduce the concept of more generic schema for sending/requesting >>>>> properties about attributes. >>>> >>>> Does that main embedding something like AX Schema.org into AX or does it >>>> mean that a new schema should be created for requesting properties? >>>> If the latter, is it possible to embed AXSchema into AX2? Or isn't it the >>>> right spot? >>> >>> Consensus is leaning toward a JSON format compatible with PoCo. I can think >>> of ways to embed AXSchema in there, but nothing I'd want to take the blame >>> for. >>> -- >>> j >> > _______________________________________________ specs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
