All,
I would appreciate any suggestions on how to put forth suggestions for
serious consideration, as my last attempt was such a failure.
Was my December proposal** really so bad (or badly written?) as to
merit no on-list responses whatsoever? One of you was kind enough to
send a note off-list (thanks!), but I am disappointed in the complete
lack of responses -- after all, I thought I was outlining a path
toward solving some problems & concerns raised by a wide variety of
folks on this list, including Luke Shepard at Facebook, Drummond Reed,
Dick Hardt, and others.
What does it take for an idea to get some attention around here??
Thanks,
Peter
**http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/2009-December/006358.html
Peter Watkins wrote:
Regarding Chris Obdam's request in
http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/2009-December/006276.html
I would like to offer first the observation that this sounds just like
Luke Shepard's checkid_immediate "middle state" proposal, on which a
number of OpenID folk have already commented:
http://www.sociallipstick.com/2009/04/15/lets-detect-logged-in-state/
And I would like to offer this proposal for implementing what Luke and
Chris want while providing simple mechanisms to address privacy concerns.
...snip...
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
