Yes, The point being it is more than just an extension. John B. On 2010-02-05, at 3:34 PM, Paul Madsen wrote:
> Are there not 2 pieces 1) an extension to carry the artifact and 2) a new > binding for dereferencing > > paul > > On 2/5/2010 11:01 AM, John Bradley wrote: >> >> This creates a new direct message type. I thought extensions were >> extending the existing messages. >> >> It is probably a grey area. >> >> Other protocols consider this to be a separate protocol binding rather than >> an extension of the redirect or POST binding. >> >> John B. >> >> >> On 2010-02-05, at 12:23 PM, David Recordon wrote: >> >>> Hey Nat, >>> Shouldn't this be considered an extension? >>> >>> --David >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Nat Sakimura <[email protected]> wrote: >>> OpenID Artifact Binding Working Group >>> Charter Proposal >>> In accordance with the OpenID Foundation IPR policies and procedures this >>> note proposes the formation of a new working group chartered to produce an >>> OpenID specification. As per Section 4.1 of the Policies, the proposed >>> charter is below. >>> I. Name >>> Artifact Binding Working Group (AB) >>> II. Statement of Purpose >>> Produce a binding of OpenID requests and response (assertion) that uses >>> direct communication for main payload and indirect communication for a >>> small reference data called Artifact to cope with long URL limits >>> experienced by man >>> III. Scope >>> Create the Artifact Binding to support the identified needs. Currently >>> identified: >>> Cope with long url problem, especially for mobile browsers. >>> Cope with the security problems of non-encrypted payload to go through the >>> user agents which may act as a man-in-the-middle. >>> IV. Specifications >>> OpenID Artifact Binding 1.0 >>> V. Anticipated audience >>> All those interested in using OpenID in mobile and other constrained >>> browser and server elements. >>> VI. Language of business >>> English. >>> VII. Method of work >>> Mailing list discussion. Posting of intermediate drafts in the OpenID Wiki. >>> Virtual conferencing on an ad-hoc basis. >>> VIII. Basis for completion of the activity >>> The Artifact Binding 1.0 spec made final. >>> Background Information >>> I. Related Work >>> SAML Artifact Binding >>> OAuth >>> Wrap >>> Contract Exchange >>> II. Initial Membership >>> Breno de Medeiros, [email protected]. Google, Inc. >>> Hideki Nara, [email protected], Tact Communications >>> Nat Sakimura, [email protected], Nomura Research Institute, Ltd. >>> (editor) >>> John Bradley, [email protected] >>> Allen Tom, [email protected], Yahoo! >>> Will Norris, [email protected] >>> III. Expected contribution >>> >>> Draft: OpenID Artifact Binding 1.0 - Draft 01, >>> http://www.sakimura.org/specs/ab/1.0/ >>> >>> -- >>> Nat Sakimura (=nat) >>> http://www.sakimura.org/en/ >>> http://twitter.com/_nat_en >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> specs mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> specs mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs >> >> >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2669 - Release Date: 02/05/10 >> 02:35:00 >> >> > _______________________________________________ > specs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
_______________________________________________ specs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
