Hi John - I was not suggesting that everyone use Artifact binding - presumably the OP will indicate that it supports Artifact binding in its discovery document, and it'll be up to the RP initiate the artifact request.
Also, regarding my previous proposal to ditch the association request for artifact binding - I concede that artifact binding is orthogonal to associations. However, if one of the goals of artifact binding is to shorten the size of the requests/responses, then eliminating the association handle would be consistent with this goal. Allen On 2/16/10 1:09 PM, "John Bradley" <[email protected]> wrote: > We can't force everyone to do artifact. We will still need to support > associations in RP's. > We cant just ditch the concept completely. > _______________________________________________ specs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
